The article about Louisiana low income residents receiving funding from the federal government for their heating and cooling costs, leads me to believe that one of the main concerns and problems in theses areas are not being addressed: community programs that encourage residents to leave their homes and save money by going to the local park and providing residents with alternatives to running up their utility costs. This sounds complicated, but it's simple. Where I'm from in California the average temperature between the months of May and September is 107°F but when residents where asking for the federal government to continuously supplement their air conditioning costs, the federal government responded by funding community facilities and programs like a local free water park. It was a great idea and this along with community programs that encouraged residents to get off the couch, also encouraged people to spend time with each other. (Note: I know this can't work everywhere, but it may help.)
The article about smart growth was fascinating to me, I had been wondering for awhile how to define affordable housing and how it really did get started. I had discussed with my urban redevelopment professor how these things occur, but I liked the historical aspect this article took on.
The chapter in the text book about social service was really interesting to me. The description of social services seemed very to the point, it's a human service industry. The wide variety of social service organizations in the non-profit sector was astonishing to me; helping families, helping patients and even helping convicted felons, there seems to be no area untouched by social services. The extent and impact that the social service industry has reaches far more people than any other industry, in my opinion. It's also very interesting that the federal government is the main funder of these non-profit social service organizations.
I'll take your argument about non profits asking for federal grants and take it one step further. Your argument made me think about when I was a youngin. I could not dream of asking my parents for money for something unless I had saved some of my own. Therefore, it seems fair that the non profits should solicit all of the funds that they possibly can from the government before they ask for money from the citizens who make so little in comparison. With that being said, non profits want to have autonomy from the government and being funded all or in part by the government would defeat the purpose but it is a thought.
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of the water park. I think anything that can be done to get people off the couch is a good plan.
I agree that the cost of heating and cooling might not be the best method of serving the people of this community. Heat seems more crucial than cooling to me. The proposition of a free water park is interesting but I'm not sure if that is something that would be as effective. Americans are constantly told to "get off the couch" but still, many don't. Water parks are mostly marketed to children and young adults while the people probably most affected and endangered by high temperatures are the elderly. This is a complicated issue with no quick fix. And as I read in Christi's blog the average temperature in August there is only the mid 80's. How necessary is air conditioning in the first place?
ReplyDeleteI thought the description of the social service sector as a human service agency was perfect. It helps to keep in perspective what social services really are, agencies helping people. The fact that the government provides the most funding creates a paradox. Ask almost any red blooded middle class American if they think the government should stay out of people's lives and they will tell you absolutely. If you press the question further, they usually say we should rely on nonprofits to take care of it. I wonder if the general public realizes how much of a stake the government already has in these organizations?
ReplyDeleteI think your last paragraph touched on something I also commented about on Gina's blog in that nonprofits do seem to leave no aspect of society untouched - I would again argue that their ability to do so stems a great deal from their detachment from the government and that they can handle "touchy" or contested issues perhaps a little more easily. I'm thankful for that too because I think that we as a society are only as good as how we take care of our weakest links in the chain so to speak.
ReplyDeletePS Happy birthday idiot! :)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI really liked the idea of federal funding going toward more community-stimulating projects than just handing it over to the cooling companies. However, I do see where the elderly are not going to be accommodated by this incentivized plan. Why can't we just make things more diverse?! Give the elderly the funding for their bills and supplement parks and recreation too. (I am obviously being idealistic) I guess in the real world you have to pick one.
ReplyDelete